Human resource analytics and adverse impact assessment based on gender: A study of academic performance and workplace disparities
Bahaudin G Mujtaba
Gender disparities in academic learning environments and in the workplace can be stressful and lead to dissatisfaction. This study investigates the impact of HR analytics education among graduate students based on gender. To assess for adverse impact in pass rates based on gender, a quantitative analysis of test scores from 113 graduate students revealed no significant differences between male and female students, indicating that the course materials and assessments were equitable and inclusive for all students. This paper provides a step-by-step process for educators and managers to assess their test outcomes for students or applicants to make sure there is no unintentional negative impact based on a people’s biological sex.
The findings suggest that HR analytics education can play a critical role in promoting fairness and inclusion in the workplace. The study's analysis process and results have important implications for legal experts, HR professionals, and managers in practice, highlighting the need for everyone to prioritize equity and inclusion by assessing test outcomes for any adverse impact based on protected categories. By doing so, organizations can keep their firms away from costly lawsuits, reduce employee stress, create a more positive and supportive work environment, and increase employee happiness. Suggestions and implications are provided.
Bahaudin G Mujtaba. Human resource analytics and adverse impact assessment based on gender: A study of academic performance and workplace disparities. Int J Res Hum Resour Manage 2025;7(1):321-331. DOI: 10.33545/26633213.2025.v7.i1d.286